Sunday, March 30, 2014
Bajaj Boxer BM150 First Photos
First photos of the Bajaj Boxer BM150..
Dubbed as the "Bharat Bike" by Bajaj, the new Boxer 150 has been already "soft" launched in a couple of states like Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh. Now for the first time photos of this new bike has emerged on the net. This one seems to be taken in Tamil Nadu. Posted below are the first photos of the bike designed for "Bharat"/Rural Indian customer.

[Photo credits: Indiancarsbikes, More photos posted below]
Expected Price: It was earlier officially stated that the ex-showroom price of the Boxer 150 would be near the Rs. 40,000 mark. So far there has been no official word on its final price or the engine specs.
Its a Herculean effort to budge rural India from its fixation from the Hero Honda (now Hero) Splendor/CD Deluxe..
150 cc engine on a basic bike
For the developed world a 150 cc is a puny engine capacity but for most Indians it is the first step towards performance/thrill biking. So when a 150 cc engine is put on what looks like a basic, utility bike, I guess most Indians would be surprised. Especially the ones who will never buy the Boxer BM150.
A 150 cc engine alone doesnt just mean that it has to be at par with a Yamaha R15 in terms of speed/KMPH. But a 150 cc engine also gives the flexibility of bumping up the "torque" (pulling capability) relatively easily.
Apart from fuel efficiency/KMPL rural folks (the target customer of this bike) also need "Torque" in a lot in the applications, like pulling "doodh/milk" cans, pulling 3-4 adults (not legal but very common everywhere) etc. There has been mention of the Boxer150 by Mr. Rajiv Bajaj as a tractor/tank on 2wheels; none of which are made for speed/KMPH but more for "Torque".
What about fuel efficiency?
The engine block on the Boxer 150 looks to have been borrowed from the Discover 150. Therefore I am expecting the Boxer 150 to return a decent (if not the best) fuel efficiency. Well you gain some and lose some.. after all one cant have the cake and eat it at the same time.
Looks,features on the Boxer BM150
The looks of the Boxer BM150 is pretty simple and basic. Nothing on the bike will excite a young enthusiast but would probably be appealing to the rural customer looking for a simple and rugged bike. The engine block seems very much similar to the ones found on the Discover 150 model but probably doesnt get the DTS-i tech. as the second spark plug is not visible in the photos.
- Flat seat
- Simple tank
- Round analog instrument console
- Round headlamp
- Spoke wheels
- Drum brakes
- Chunky looking Rear Tyre
- Steel carrier cum grab rail
- Bajajs SnS (Spring in Spring) rear suspension
- An electric starter (visible in the photos)
Will the Boxer BM150 find favor among Rural India?
Its actually nothing sort of a Herculean effort to budge rural India from its fixation from the Hero Honda Splendor/CD Deluxe. The blind trust of these Hero Honda models in Rural India has made what Hero Honda (now Hero MotoCorp) what it is, i.e. the largest maker of 2 wheelers in the world.
Therefore to expect the so far fixated with the "Hero Honda Splendor" crowd to look at the Boxer BM150 favorably would not be so easy. Like the Splendor which has proved it worth for over 16 years now, the Boxer BM150 will also have to prove itself over time.
Having seen how much recent Bajaj products have improved (current Discovers and the Pulsar 135 are proof), I am sure that the Boxer BM150 would also be a reliable product as well. Its just that probably Bajaj will have to be a bit patient with the Boxer BM150 and let the rural customer develop a trust on the product. Only then a product will transform into a brand.
Bajaj Boxer BM150 Photos:
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Related Posts
- Cant understand Mr. Bajajs Discover/Pulsar/Boxer strategy? Read this
- Bajaj to launch 150 cc Boxer [Feb 2011]
- TVS Max 4R: First look/details (Utiliy bike from TVS) [Jul, 2010]
- Difference between Power and Torque
- How to physically visualize Torque"
Disclaimer:
This is to remind that the Views or Opinions in the blog are entirely mine unless explicitly stated. The Views and Opinions published in this blog should in no way be related to any other person or organization associated -- directly or indirectly -- with me.
Saturday, March 22, 2014
Honda CBF1000 2007 First Ride
But somehow, regardless of their big jugs, the liter-sized strippers have failed to appeal and youd better not try comparing Italian market sales figures for the 599 to those of the 919; itll be downright embarrassing.
The big four have noticed this scandalous injustice a while ago and are trying to address the situation.
Yamaha has pushed the lovely FZ-1 towards the ragged edge this year with an aluminum frame, bizarre-ish design and extreme engine tuning, and Kawasaki is following the same route for 2007 with the new version of the Z1000. Both companies seem eager to transform their do-it-all giants into extreme "naked-sports" thingies. Someone in Honda must have thought that redemption for liter nakeds might be found elsewhere then, at the opposite end of the scale. Instead of chasing the city racers and wheelie hooligans, why not go for the mature boys, the once-in-a-while tourers with a family and a mortgage?
Cast a look at the new CBF1000 and youll understand immediately that a weekend in its company will be more a "lets hold hands" type of thing rather than a sweaty and steamy affair.
Honda product planners seemingly drew their inspiration from the discreet success of the Europe-only CBF600, a cute mid-weight touring naked of sorts and have morphed the 919 into a much more sedate type of tool.
Look behind the half fairing and youll indeed find the same basic rectangular steel backbone tube frame of the 599/919.
Honda didnt try to re-cycle too many parts in creating the CBF1000 (the seat unit looks too familiar though); its more as if the bodywork of the CBF600 was simply scaled up by 10% by the 3D CAD software. Compared to its smaller brother, the main differences that stick out are the strange, arc-shaped, silver-painted side panels and the use of nothing less than the latest version of the CBR1000RR mill to propel the thing.
"Its more as if the bodywork of the CBF600 was simply scaled up by 10%..."
That means a good 78 HP have been chopped for "better midrange response". I cant think of a reason as to why Honda would decide to use this engine when they already had good torque producers in the shape of the previous 954 Fireblade mill or the 1100 motor of the Super Blackbird. Why they used a power unit with a relatively extreme bore and stroke ratio is beyond me. Maybe this is paving the road for the new 1000 version of the 919, a bike that will surely come pretty soon.
Till that one arrives, its the CBF1000 that we are dealing with. By the sound of it you might be tempted to see it as a contender to the new half-faired FZ-1 tested in MOs 2006 naked comparo, but in reality the two are aimed at very different folks. The FZ-1 is all about sharp angles, tight lines and complex syntax while the CBF offers smooth classic lines, soft curves and a plain-Jane composition of its components. The final result is indeed a close cousin to the groovy and well-proportioned CBF600, just not as well groomed in my opinion. I think that the most offending element in the CBF1000s design is that odd, arc-shaped side panel thats stuck smack in the middle of the bike, a rather boring focal point.
The aesthetics complaint chapter ends a few minutes into the ride. De-tuned the engine might be, a puppy dog, a pussycat, call it as you like but Ive yet to experience such an elastic response and so much user friendliness from a liter tool. With an extreme starting point such as the CBR1000RR mill, textbooks say it shouldnt be so, but smaller throttle bodies and a host of other mods have turned the fire-breathing Fireblade powerplant into a refined unit that purrs happily from what feels like zero RPM.
A close look at the CBFs torque curve published by one of the local mags shows that from a silly 3,000 RPM and up the power unit supplies 61.4 foot pounds of torque and never dips under this figure till 8,000 RPM, climbing to a 68.7 foot-pound peak at 6,500 RPM. And that curve doesnt lie. Its kind of usual to attach the expression "pulls from any revs" to big twins, but this four-cylinder mill could teach some big twins the meaning of "low-down pull".
"When the road gets kinky, the wonderfully grunty motor remains a big source of satisfaction and pull."
When I took the bike from Honda, one mechanic suggested I try starting from standstill in sixth gear. "Do it gently and youll see it manages". Well, I didnt go that far; I didnt feel like being left stranded with a fried clutch in case it didnt work as planned. But I did try the trick in fourth gear and, by golly, it does pull away! I also let the revs drop to 1,500 in sixth and the CBF gathered itself together without any of the shaking power pulsing and drama that youd find in, say, a Ducati 1000 at such revs. So then, it turns out that leaving aside the new FJR 1300, this CBF1000 is the closest thing to riding an automatic bike that Ive ever tried. On secondary roads that are free of dead-slow hairpins, you can pretty much leave the thing in sixth and forget about shifting.
The relaxed attitude is also displayed in the pilots environment. Its not as plush as that of a GoldWing to be sure, yet its still very comfy. Theres an ultra-soft seat, a very natural bend in the handlebars, a total lack of vibes and the fairing protects well till 80-85 mph (though not beyond). Considering the budget nature of the CBF1000 there is also a surprising feature in the form of seat height adjustability (with an Allen key) but I didnt have the chance to try that.
So this CBF isnt really a tourer or sport tourer but rather a standard comfy roadster with a half fairing. OK then, doesnt that mean that it should also be a good back road scratcher? Isnt that part of the charm of these high-bar, simple-to-ride tools?
When the road gets kinky, the wonderfully grunty motor remains a big source of satisfaction and pull, but the rest of the package doesnt leave a clear impression. Yep, theres plenty of oomph to drive you out of turns and thankfully, the highish handlebars do help while throwing the CBF around with abandon but there are limits to the idyll too.
"This nice-guy attitude has some limits."
The extra leverage is really needed as Honda engineers put more attention to stability rather than flickability on this one.
Up to 80-90 percent on the speed scale, the CBF1000 does behave itself, supplying a semi-sporty experience, but dont get too serious about getting your adrenaline fix with this one. Pile on the coals and the 160-section rear tire starts to move around.
Slam on the brakes with authority and the fork consumes its entire available stroke in one big gulp without a hint of guilt or remorse.
The progressively-linked rear shock copes rather well with the increased demands but its the single-backbone frame that at a certain point cries "enough is enough". The well-behaved motor also tries to tell you that torque is torque but still, power is power. What I mean is that plenty of drive at 4,000 or 5,000 RPM is a nice thing to have but when riding above semi-fast speeds, you dont spend much time at those kinds of revs and the lack of kick higher up the range is missed.
I cant think of an easier liter bike to ride to work with on a daily basis...
In reality, after 8,000 revs theres a serious drop in power so that you dont even feel tempted to try and bump into the rev limiter and simply hook up the next gear. I must add that knowing about the 12,000 RPM redline potential of this very engine in its Fireblade incarnation left me with mixed feelings about the limited rev range of this otherwise fine unit.
Considering the budget calipers mounted, the braking power was rather good, but also brought to light a strange problem. The top half of the fairing ends in two sharp corners that are positioned exactly in front of the riders knees. When braking hard, unless I was making a conscious effort to brace myself on the gas tank my knees often met the offending corners. Ouch!
Since were talking `bout braking, it might be worth noting that Ive been riding the standard version of the CBF1000 but theres also an ABS-CBS version with linked anti lock brakes. The CBF1000ST model is equipped with higher-spec Brembo calipers and some of my colleagues reported improved braking power. On top of the sophisticated brakes, the ST version comes with original hard luggage, adding about 10% to the basic models price.
Back in town, the tables are turned back again. The CBF1000 simply shines here and thats no mean feat for a 1000 tool in the narrow city streets.
I cant think of an easier liter bike to ride to work with on a daily basis except maybe -- just maybe -- the GT1000 I road tested not long ago. The drivers around me are nervous, the weather is extra hot but the CBF maintains its millennium nirvana. The reduced fairing lowers of the CBF let the heat disperse with ease, the seat is still comfy regardless of the massive sweating, all the levers and controls remain buttery smooth and I must admit that I am cursing less than usual inside my boiling helmet considering the heavy heat.
The CBF1000 seems to have a calming effect of sorts.Whether thats good or bad is a matter of taste and personality but on the cobblestone-paved streets I find myself quite happy with the softish springing and damping rates chosen by Hondas test riders for the CBF.Its just too easy to blame and disdain the CBF for not being all sorts of things. Like not being a proper contender to the aforementioned FZ-1 or Z1000 or for not having a more inspiring design or color schemes. But then, it seems like Honda never planned a glittering rock star status for their cute CBF1000.
Moving over to the half-full side of the glass, its just as easy to praise the fact that together with the SV1000, its the worlds cheapest liter tool. Or that its almost an up-to-date water-cooled Bandit 1200 rather than a road-burning streetfighter.
The model is not headed to the US this year but seen in a European context, the CBF1000 could be a great and un-intimidating step up the displacement ladder for somebody whos growing out of a 599 or FZ6. Seen as such, the CBF1000 has a rationale behind it, a rationale that can speak volumes to the 40-50 something born-again bikers that are so numerous these days across the pond. Its an easy to live with on a daily basis, 1000cc roadster that could also take you on a comfy weekend-long two-up trip. Does this sound just too serene and relaxed?
Honda seems to believe that the market for this kind of tool and attitude exists and how. I wouldnt be surprised if a year from now, Honda ends up selling more CBFs than the competition sells flashy FZ-1s or Z1000s.
| 2007 Honda CBF1000 (ED-type)** Specs courtesy of Honda ** | |
| Engine | |
| Type | Liquid-cooled 4-stroke 16-valve DOHC inline-4 |
| Displacement | 998cm3 |
| Bore x Stroke | 75 x 56.5mm |
| Compression Ratio | 11: 1 |
| *Claimed* Max. Power Output | 72kW/8,000min-1 (95/1/EC) |
| *Claimed* Max. Torque | 97Nm/6,500min-1 (95/1/EC) |
| Idling Speed | 1,200min-1 |
| Oil Capacity | 3.6litres |
| Fuel System | |
| Carburation | PGM-FI electronic fuel injection |
| Throttle Bore | 36mm |
| Aircleaner | Dry, cartridge-type paper filter |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 19litres (including 4-litre LCD-indicated reserve) |
| Electrical System | |
| Ignition System | Computer-controlled digital transistorised with electronic advance |
| Ignition Timing | 5° BTDC (idle) ~ 45° BTDC (7,500min-1) |
| Sparkplug Type | CR8EH-9 (NGK); U24FER9 (ND) |
| Starter | Electric |
| Battery Capacity | 12V/8.6AH |
| ACG Output | 330W |
| Headlight | 12V, 55W x 1 (low)/55W x 2 (high) |
| Drivetrain | |
| Clutch | Wet, multiplate with coil springs |
| Clutch Operation | Hydraulic |
| Transmission Type | 6-speed |
| Primary Reduction | 1.604 (77/48) |
| Gear Ratios | 1 2.714 (38/14) 2 1.941 (33/17) 3 1.579 (30/19) 4 1.363 (30/22) 5 1.217 (28/23) 6 1.115 (29/26) |
| Final Reduction | 2.687 (43/16) |
| Final Drive | #530 O-ring sealed chain |
| Frame | |
| Type | Mono-backbone; rectangular-section steel tube |
| Chassis | |
| Dimensions (LxWxH) | 2,176 x 827 x 1,175mm |
| Wheelbase | 1,483mm |
| Caster Angle | 26° |
| Trail | 110mm |
| Turning Radius | 2.8m |
| Seat Height | 795mm (+/-15mm) |
| Ground Clearance | 130mm |
| *Claimed* Dry Weight | 220kg , *228kg |
| Kerb Weight | 242kg (F: 118kg; R: 124kg), *250kg (F: 120kg; R: 130kg) |
| Max. Carrying Capacity | 195kg |
| Loaded Weight | 242kg, *250kg |
| Suspension | |
| Front | 41mm cartridge-type telescopic fork, 120mm axle travel |
| Rear | Pro-Link with gas-charged HMAS damper, 120mm axle travel |
| Wheels | |
| Front | Hollow-section 6-spoke cast aluminium |
| Rear | Hollow-section 6-spoke cast aluminium |
| Rim Size Front | 17M/C x MT3.5 |
| Rim Size Rear | 17M/C x MT5 |
| Tyre Size Front | 120/70-ZR17M/C (58W) |
| Tyre Size Rear | 160/60-ZR17M/C (69W) |
| Tyre Pressure | Front 250kPa Rear 290kPa |
| Brakes | |
| Front | 296 x 4.5mm dual hydraulic disc with 4-piston (*Combined 3-piston) callipers, floating rotors (*ABS) and sintered metal pads |
| Rear | 240 x 6mm hydraulic disc with single-piston (*3-piston) calliper (*ABS) and sintered metal pads |
| * ABS version | All specifications are provisional and subject to change without notice. |
First Impression 1998 Yamaha XT350
The expired bikes odometer reads 800 miles. This is well past the 600 miles recommended for proper break in, even if I havent paid a lick of attention to the procedure. On this day, though Ive already come 300 miles, Ive got another hundred or so to go before Im home. I survey the countryside surrounding me and determine my exact location. There is a distinct lack of landmarks, absolutely none whatsoever. There is nothing but empty space. I spend the next forty-five minutes trying to flag cars down out of the night, praying for a kindly driver with a cell phone to come to my rescue. But alas, I am a scary biker and dressed the part. It doesnt happen. I start walking hoping to find a highway call-box somewhere in the murky gloom. Half a mile away from my bike I look back to see a vehicle pulled to the shoulder next to the bike.
It turns out to be a big ole extend-a-cab Ford F-250 pickup truck. The guy behind the wheel tells me he usually doesnt pull over to help people, but since he saw me walking, then saw my bike, and he is a fellow rider (who else would stop?), he thought hed break this habit and offer a hand. He asks me if Im headed anywhere near Redondo Beach. As a matter of fact, I live within 10 miles of the place. Perfect, we load up the bike (he even has tie downs!) and off we go, on a 100 mile jaunt. He drops me at my pad, bike and all. I wish getting home after every breakdown could be so easy.
Now, I needed to break the news to Yamaha: Their machine was dead. It perished in my hands. Yamaha, bless their souls, took the bike back and swapped it for a new one for the sake of this story. Subsequent questioning about the status of the Mr. Hyde XT revealed that the bike had suffered an oil pump failure. An oil light would be nice. That was the bad news. Yamaha has made this bike for more than a decade and they tell me they had never heard of this kind of failure. In fact, when I first told them the motor had let go, they were rather shocked. The XT350 motor has a reputation for being bulletproof.
| | |
So, having panned the first bike, lets discuss the merits of the next machine, a Dr. Jeckyl to the Mr. Hyde XT. The XT is surprisingly good on the highway. Riding position is upright, but wind is somewhat deflected by the G-string faring (the fairing is too small to be called even a bikini fairing). Body position somewhat counteracts the wind as well and makes the XT more tolerable for disposing mileage than many cruisers, which force a rider to adopt the dreaded flying squirrel posture. Cruising speed is on the moderate side, though the motor willingly spins up close to redline in sixth gear, good for maintaining speeds in the 75 miles per hour range. With a tailwind, 90 mph is possible, but it would be positively rotten to maintain this speed for any time. The mirrors work well, offering a vibration-free picture without including any elbows in the vision equation. For extended highway trips the seat is on the narrow side, but adjusting body position by moving forward and back allows extended saddle time. My longest day thus far on the bike has been 500 miles. And I could walk afterwards. Longer stints are definitely possible. If you are looking to buy a machine to actually ride to an ORV area, the XT would be perfect.
Gearing on the Yamaha is on the low side of the spectrum. This is because Yamaha wanted the XT to handle "plonking" along trails with aplomb. Low speed sections should be no trouble, the bike will "plonk" along without complaint. Be ready to shift up in situations you might not normally think youd have to. As a matter of fact, you might even find yourself grabbing an extra gear when setting up for long hill climbs just to carry momentum without revving the piss out of the machine in a low gear. What this means in street-riding terms is that you can expect to hit third gear by the time youve crossed an intersection from a standstill at a stoplight. Most of the torque lives at lower rpm, but there is a little rush of power as the four-stroke single approaches redline. Wheelies are possible in second gear, but only if a handful of throttle is accompanied by a firm yank on the handle bars. Sitting back on the saddle helps, too. The motor is predictable and sufficient, but to have real fun on your XT, think about spending some extra dough on tweaking the motor once youve gotten bored with the stock power delivery.
The shock on the rear has an adjusting knob for changing the damping and preload can be adjusted via a threaded collar. There are a number of nice features on the XT. Snail-cam adjusters reside on either side of the rear axle, so chain adjustment is a snap. The engine has a counterbalancer, which leads to an extremely smooth-spinning motor. There are also passenger pegs on the bike. (I found these were good for resting my legs on long trips.) Be forewarned, however, taking a passenger isnt the most comfy of propositions. I found myself having to sit farther forward on the saddle than my manhood and I would have preferred. Also, with two full-sized people onboard, there is an excessive amount of sag on the rear end. It is a good bike for many different weather conditions, though. In inclement weather, the XT shines. The heavily treaded tires yield good, wet grip for stopping, cornering, and acceleration. Maneuverability is especially good with the wide handlebars offering easy leverage and instilling confidence. This trait serves well on both the trail and in the urban jungle. Lane splitting on the XT is easy with its upright seating giving a good view of traffic.
Starting duties on the kick start XT can be a challenge, but once mastered, its smooth. Simply leave the bike on the kickstand so you can get a better kick, stand on the pegs and giveer whatfer. Once it starts, let it idle for a few moments then be sure to retract the kickstand. It kills the motor if you put the machine in gear with the kickstand down. When cold, the bike likes some choke; when hot, it takes none. The gray area of the starting equation comes when the bike is actually warm, having been ridden within the past few hours, or stopped/stalled before reaching full operating temperature. This no- mans-land can lead to frustration and a whupped kicking leg. Faith and persistence will carry the day. Good luck.
Specifications:
Yamaha XT350
Price: $4449
346cc air-cooled four-valve four-stroke
86 x 59.6mm bore & stroke
9:1 compression ratio
24mm Teikei carburetor
6-speed transmission
33.7" seat height
88.2" x 34.1" x 47.6" (overall length x width x height)
55.9" wheelbase
10.8" ground clearance
Fuel Capacity: 3.2 gallons (including 0.5 gallon reserve)
Telescopic forks, 10" of travel
Single rear shock, 8.6" of travel
3.00-21 front tire
110/80-18 rear tire
262 pound dry weight
Friday, March 21, 2014
First Impression 1996 BMW R850R
The R850R shares most all the same features found on its larger stablemate. The fuel-injected, four-valve twin-cylinder engine is identical to the R1100Rs mill, save for a smaller bore (87.8mm vs 99mm). Combined with the Bosch Motronic engine management system, BMW clai
As an entry-level motorcycle, the BMW R850R has all the talents required to fit the billing -- except for the price
Specifications:
Manufacturer: BMW
Model: R850R
Price: $8990.00
Engine: Air cooled/oil cooled boxer twin cylinder
Bore x Stroke: 87.8 mm x 70.5 mm
Displacement: 848 cc
Carburetion: Bosch Motronic fuel injection
Transmission: 5-speed, shaft drive
Wheelbase: 57.99 in.
Seat height: variable, 29.9 - 31.5 in.
Fuel capacity: 5.5 gallons
Claimed dry weight: 482 lbs.
Tuesday, March 4, 2014
First Ride 1995 Kawasaki Vulcan 1500
At 1,470cc (88 cubic inches) the Vulcan 88 is the largest production V-twin cruiser on the market today. Its probably the longest, too. At 557 pounds dry with a 63.2 inch wheelbase, the big Kawasaki is the stretch limo of cruisers! Fortunately, its as comfy as one.

The huge seat is well contoured and pillowy soft, while the bars have a tall rise and reach back to the rider. Footpegs are mounted well forward, adding to the spacious feel. The long wheelbase allows for plenty of passenger room, and our resident pillion tester reported the thickly-padded seat and backrest to be among the most comfortable in the cruiser class.
"Fit and finish is good, with tons of chrome everywhere."
Even the coolant tank, which is mounted directly behind the engine on the right side, has a highly-polished chrome cover. Kawasaki did a good job of giving the liquid-cooled V-twin motor an air-cooled appearance, an important styling feature in the highly competitive cruiser market. Nice styling touches, like the braided-wire covers for the four spark-plug leads (it has dual-plug heads), abound on this bike. Switches and controls are typical Kawasaki fare, familiar and easy to use.
You wont find a tachometer on the Vulcan 88, but with this bikes prodigious power spread, who needs one? You shift when you suddenly realize that youve been in the same gear for the last hour or so. Mounted above a cluster of warning lights in a heavily chromed panel is the speedometer, out in the wind and easy to read.

The only other gauge on the Vulcan is a nice, large fuel gauge mounted in, you guessed it, a heavily chromed console on top of the fuel tank. Youll have to keep a close eye on this gauge though, as the needle sweeps quite rapidly from Full to Empty. The big Kawasaki can suck the 4.2 gallon tank dry in as little as 120 miles or so of spirited riding. And with the kind of roll-on power the Vulcan 88 has, who can resist? Equipped with four-valve twin-plug heads, 36mm carbs, and an effective counter balancer, the deep-breathing V-twin (with a stroke of 90mm) produces V-8 sized power pulses from V-8 size pistons, and provides arm-stretching acceleration anytime you wind up the throttle -- in any gear, from any speed.
"The monster motor feeds its power through a beefy four-speed transmission -- the power spread is unbelievably wide, and four gears is more than enough to handle the load. There is so much available torque that you could stick the Vulcan in third gear and ride around town without ever having to change gears."


This may be contributed to parts that have not broken in yet, or that magazine test bikes lead a harder-than-normal life. A firm, deliberate prod with your left boot on the large gear lever is required to overcome the neutral finder system and make it safely into second gear.
This is not a light-shifting, snick-snick style gearbox. And while were complaining, we would have like to see a much wider ratio gearbox -- the Vulcan is spinning (relatively) high rpms at 70 mph while droning around the freeway, and we constantly nudged the shifter up, looking for a taller gear. The awesome torque and acceleration of the big Vulcan, though, will easily overwhelm the suspension. Both front and rear ends of the bike are tuned for a smooth ride. The front forks are unadjustable, and the twin rear shocks, adjustable for spring preload only, are too under-sprung and under-damped for anything above a boulevard pace. Riding the Vulcan on your favorite back road will have you quickly retreating back to familiar urban jungles. The brakes are also easily overwhelmed by the Vulcans substantial size. The single front disc works acceptably well while stylin downtown, but fades quickly when trying to slow down in a hurry. It also tends to twist the forks a little.
The rear disc, with its single-action caliper, is surprisingly weak, offering little stopping power. Overall though, the Vulcan 88 works exceptionally well in the confines of the city, where it delivers quite an impressive profile during those Friday night cruises downtown and everyday riding and commuting chores. Kept within its element, the Vulcan is a force to be reckoned with. The amazing motor is almost enough to overshadow the rest of the bikes shortcomings -- Kawasaki has seen fit to once again provide it in copious amounts, this time to the cruiser class. The 88 is the Power Cruiser. If "Big," "Flashy," and "Dominant" are words you have to have in your cruiser vocabulary, then the Vulcan 88 is for you.
Impressions:
1. Brent Plummer, Editor
Lets clear one thing up right now: I like Kawasakis. All four bikes that I own bear this mark, and Ill tell you why: I dig powerful motorcycles. Not necessarily 1000cc behemoths, but relatively powerful bikes that are the beasts of their class. And thats Kawasakis game. Heck, its their identity -- they build honkin fast motors and wedge them into things, then kick ass on boulevards and back roads around the world.
Theyve been doing it for 25 years now and the tradition continues with the Vulcan. So naturally, I like it, and can understand why theyre sold out at dealers in America. And equally important, my girlfriend likes the pillion seat and standard sissy bar, meaning she looks forward to riding anywhere, anytime on the Vulcan. I just wish it wasnt so damn ugly: If I owned one, the chromed "ears" on both sides of the bike that are actually air cleaner covers would be powder-coated black, as would the tanks huge chrome gauge mount, which is perfectly aligned to blind the driver whenever the sun is shining down. Oh, yes, the front brake sucked, too. In all, though, the huge motor and distinctive styling (read: not a Harley-Davidson rip-off) was more than enough to put big grins on my face whenever I rode it. ****
Specifications:
Manufacturer: Kawasaki
Model: VN1500-A8
Price: $8199
Engine: SOHC, 8-valve, liquid-cooled V-twin
Bore x Stroke: 102 x 90 mm
Displacement: 1,470 cc
Carburetion: Dual Keihin CV 36mm
Transmission: 4-speed, shaft drive
Wheelbase: 63.2 in.
Seat height: 28.3 in.
Fuel capacity: 4.2 gallons
Claimed dry weight: 557 lbs.
Wednesday, February 26, 2014
First Impression 1996 BMW R850R
The R850R shares most all the same features found on its larger stablemate. The fuel-injected, four-valve twin-cylinder engine is identical to the R1100Rs mill, save for a smaller bore (87.8mm vs 99mm). Combined with the Bosch Motronic engine management system, BMW clai
As an entry-level motorcycle, the BMW R850R has all the talents required to fit the billing -- except for the price
Specifications:
Manufacturer: BMW
Model: R850R
Price: $8990.00
Engine: Air cooled/oil cooled boxer twin cylinder
Bore x Stroke: 87.8 mm x 70.5 mm
Displacement: 848 cc
Carburetion: Bosch Motronic fuel injection
Transmission: 5-speed, shaft drive
Wheelbase: 57.99 in.
Seat height: variable, 29.9 - 31.5 in.
Fuel capacity: 5.5 gallons
Claimed dry weight: 482 lbs.
2014 KAWASAKI NINJA 1000 ABS – FIRST RIDE
2014 KAWASAKI NINJA 1000 ABS – FIRST RIDE

Kawasaki was kind enough to invite us up to Laguna Seca to watch its current ZX-10R tear up the track under Tom Sykes—who won Race 1 in World Superbike—and nobody can deny what a brilliant motorcycle the 10R is. But I think we can all agree that for getting to Monterey from SoCal, its racy dynamics and lack of road-hugging weight make it not the first pick of the average metrosexual motorcycle “journalist.” One hates to date oneself, since there’s no chance of splitting the check, but I broke into this business just in time to ride the original Kawasaki ZX-10 back in the day before they started appending “R” to everything. On that bike, we could and did ride all day, with stuff stuffed into our bulbous tailsections and bungeed on behind. But, ahhh, that was 20 years ago. Okay, 25.
How refreshing that Kawasaki still makes a bike like that original ZX-10; you can still feel the origin of the species in the Ninja 1000 we rode to Monterey this year, but subtle revisions and big changes—including the addition of very nice new optional hard bags—mean this bike covers a wide spectrum ranging from nearly pure sportbike to not quite sport-tourer. That 1,043cc four-banger (lifted from the Z1000 for the original Ninja 1000 three years ago) was already powerful, smooth-running and super flexible: For 2014, a new intake cam with 0.3mm less lift and 6 degrees less duration (along with ECU, intake and exhaust changes) means it pulls noticeably harder at low rpm, with peak torque happening 500 rpm sooner. And Kawasaki says the retuned engine pulls harder from 7,000 on up, too. (It’s so strong down low and in the middle that I barely ever revved it far enough to find out.) The last Ninja 1000 we dyno’d produced about 125 horses and 75 foot-pounds torque. While that’s 40-some hp shy of a ZX-10R on top, the Ninja in fact makes a little more torque, and it does it at about 7,500 rpm instead of at 10-something. In other words, on 99 percent of public roads, the 10R’s really got nothing on the Ninja except a slight disadvantage.
Get it into top gear, and you can feel free to just leave the Ninja there until you get where you’re going; a taller sixth gear drops rpm to 5,500 at 80 mph. Or, flog the nostrils off it (now tuned for an even angrier intake honk). The 2014 bike gets the 3-mode traction control system like the one on the ZX-14R, and twisting the throttle foolhardy amounts at deep lean angles results not in wheelspin and low-level flight, but instead a tighter line. You’ve also got your choice of Low and Full power modes (Low provides 70 percent of Full power in the mid- and upper-rpm ranges). Riding like a maniac is not the Ninja’s mission really, but it’s nice to know it can do it, and maniacal is even more achievable with its revised suspension: A 3-percent stiffer rear spring and firmer damping front and rear provide a sportier ride that seems no less comfortable, really. And the main source of that comfort is the bike’s excellent ergonomics. You lean just far enough forward to offset what little wind gets past the three-position, adjustable-by-hand windscreen, and rubber-topped footpegs are in a natural, humane place. The passenger seat might not be quite as comfy as some, but there are new and improved grab handles. Gaze upon a big analog tachometer that turns red at 11, and a new LCD window that displays all the KTRC (traction control) info, along with average or current fuel consumption and all the other usual information. With its 5.0-gallon steel tank and a burn rate of approximately 40-42 mpg on our little jaunt, range is right around 200 miles.
Adding anti-lock brakes to the new bike is the main reason the price has been raised from previous version’s $11,099 to $11,999, and if ABS has ever saved your bacon (like it has mine), you don’t need to be told that it’s the best $900 you’ll ever spend. New monoblock brake calipers, a radial master cylinder and a five-way-adjustable front lever slow the 509-pound (claimed curb weight) Ninja ridiculously hard on its custom-tailored Bridgestone tires.
Because of the optional hard bags, Kawasaki built a new aluminum subframe to accommodate them, along with a new seat with which my rear end had no issues. To maintain level flight, a new remote preload adjuster is easy to twist by hand. The bags themselves are based upon a Givi design, and work great, which you’d expect for $1,269.75. And you’ll be having them dealer-installed, since he’ll be the only guy able to key the locks to your bike’s ignition key. Each bag can hold 28 liters or a helmet, and when you pop them off to carry into the Ritz, the bike looks just as svelte without them.
At the end of the day, I am left wondering what bigger, heavier sport-touring bikes can do that the Ninja 1000 ABS can’t, especially if you like to stick to the squiggly lines on the map. I suppose they’re better for a passenger. Electronic cruise control is nice, and a thing the Ninja doesn’t have—but like the gentleman from Vancouver on the bug-encrusted first-gen FJR1300 pointed out when we finally stopped to cool our jets along California 1, it’s really no big deal: A nice Throttlemeister-type throttle lock works about 90 percent as well with about a tenth of the complexity. There’s no denying the sweetness of our Ten Best darling BMW K1600GT, but that bike is more than 200 pounds heavier than the Ninja.
Maybe we call the Ninja 1000 and its ilk (Yamaha FZ1, Suzuki GSX-1250FA, Honda VFR1200F) “supersport tourers,” a market segment Kawasaki thinks is on the uptick. In that crowd, the green bike (which also comes in blue), runs at the front of the pack. I’m trying to think of one motorcycle that does more things better than this one—commute, travel, strafe backroads, promote hair growth while treating low T—





